Glyph Origins

The system presented here is a compromise between several reconstructions. The main one being:

It’s slightly changed in some respects given the following reconstruction utilizing modern palaeographical research:

Other than that, some changes are made when the choise of a reconstruction is not wise in Baxter & Sagart 2014 (the notable example being 火). Changes include research on other Trans-Himalayan branches (especially Gyalrongic), palaeographical material, modern Sinitic topolects, other (S)EA languages etc. Some of the resources utilized:

etc…

Also, I refrained from explicitly showing morphology. Instead, affixes like *-s, *m- etc. are written without hyphens.